THE EFFECT OF TREFFINGER, LAPS-HEURISTIC MODELS, AND MOTIVATION ON STUDENTS’ WRITING ACHIEVEMENT

hasrul  fahmi; Muhammad Nasir

doi:10.56806/jh.v4i1.127

Authors

hasrul fahmi Stikes Muhammdiyah Lhokseumawe
Muhammad Nasir The State Polytechnic of Lhokseumawe

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56806/jh.v4i1.127

Keywords:

Treffingers’ Learning Model, LAPS Heuristic Model, Motivation, Expository Writing

Abstract

This research was conducted with Quantitave research aimed to find out the students’ writing achievement taught by using Treffingers’ Learning Model and LAPS Heuristic Model and also to find out the students’ writing achievement with high and low motivation. The method of this research used was experimental research with factorial design 2x2. The sample of this study was XI IPA of SMA Negeri 1 Kota Lhokseumawe, which consisted of 36 students XI IPA, the sample was applied by random sampling technique. The instruments of this study were obtained by writing test and questionnaire sheet. The summary of post-test data description in each group of learning model showed in statistical is Treffingers’ Learning Model = 17.50 and LAPS Heuristic = 16.03. So, Treffingers’ Learning Model (17.50) > (16.03) LAPS Heuristic Model. Then, the data were analyzed by using ANOVA test at the level of significant ? = 0,05. Based on the data analysis, the findings proved that the students’ writing achievement taught by using Treffingers’ Learning Model was higher than that taught by using LAPS Heuristic Model, with F_obs (20.13) > F_tab (3.13).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ary, D. 2010. Introduction to Research in Education. Eight Edition. Canada: Nelson Education.

Arikunto, S. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Arikunto, S. 2013. Prosedur Penelitian; Suatu Pendekatan Praktik, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta

Anggrianto, D., M. Churiyah, and M. Arief. 2016. “Improving Critical Thinking Skills Using Learning Model Logan Avenue Problem Solving (LAPS)-Heuristic.” Journal of Education and Practice 7(9): 128–36

Babbie, E. 1990. Survey Research Methods. 2d ed. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

Brown, H. D. 2000. Teaching by Principles. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Pearson. Longman.

Brown, H. D. 2000. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching,4th Ed. (New York:

Addison Wesley Longman. Inc)

Dörnyei, Z. 1994. Motivation and motivating in the foreign language classroom. Modern Language Journal, 78,p. 273-284

Elliot. A.J. 2006. The Hierarchical Model of Approach-Avoidance Motivation. Motivation Emotion. p. 111–116.

Ilyas, M., Ismail, Z., Zulfidar, F., Abdurrahman, F., Islami, N., & Ginting, R. (2021). Analisis Kritis Eksistensi Perguruan Tinggi Negeri-Swasta Di Aceh. JURNAL HURRIAH: Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan Dan Penelitian, 2(1), 49-59. https://doi.org/10.5806/jh.v2i1.10

Graham, S and D, Perin. 2007. Writing Next: Effective Strategies to Improve Writing

Adolescences in Middle and High Schools – A Report to Carnegie Corporation of

New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.

Sinaga, N. Handayani, 2019 .The Effect of Using Logan Avenue Problem Solving Heuristic Learning Model on Students’ Reading Achievement. DSpace Repository Journals, Vol.2. http://repositori.umsu.ac.id

Sumiara, Riyanto.Y, Suhanadji. 2019. The Effect of Treffinger Learning Model On

Critical Thinking Ability And Student Learning Outcomes. International Journal

of Scientific and Research Publications, Vol. 9, Issue 6. pp. 738. ISSN 2250-3153

Treffinger, D. J, S.G. Isaksen, and K. B.Dorval. 2003. Creative Problem Solving (CPS Version 6.1 TM): A Contemporary Framework for Managing Chance. Center for Creative Learning, Inc. and Creative Problem Solving Group, Inc. Website: www.cpsb.com

Treffinger D. J, E.C. Selby and S.G. Isaksen. 2008. Understanding individual problem

solving style: A key to learning and applying creative problem solving learning

and individual differences vol:18 p.390