Energy Density Prediction of Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs) From Synthesis Conditions Using Deep Neural Network (DNN): Hydrogen Storage Application
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56806/jh.v7i1.414Keywords:
Deep Neural Network (DNN), Hydrogen Storage, Soft SensorAbstract
The global transition toward sustainable energy systems necessitates efficient and scalable hydrogen storage technologies. Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have emerged as promising candidates for hydrogen storage due to their high surface area, tunable pore structures, and favorable surface chemistry that enhance adsorption performance. However, real-time experimental measurement of hydrogen uptake using physical sensing systems is costly, computationally intensive, and operationally complex. To address these limitations, this study proposes a data-driven soft-sensor framework based on machine learning to predict energy density for hydrogen storage applications from synthesis parameters. High-fidelity secondary data sourced from an open-access Kaggle dataset were utilized, focusing on synthesis descriptors including metal type, oxidation state, temperature, and reaction time. Recognizing the intrinsic influence of transition metals on structural stability and adsorption behavior, a per-metal modeling strategy was implemented to capture material-specific relationships. A Deep Neural Network (DNN) employing a Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) architecture trained via backpropagation was developed to model nonlinear interactions between structural variables and energy density. To enhance interpretability, complementary linear regression models were also constructed, yielding explicit predictive equations. Model performance was rigorously evaluated using statistical error metrics, achieving a Mean Squared Error (MSE) of 0.0821 and a Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) of 0.2852, demonstrating strong predictive capability and generalization across different metallic linkers. The low error values confirm that artificial neural network–based soft sensors provide a reliable, low-latency alternative to physical sensing systems for monitoring hydrogen storage performance. This approach significantly reduces experimental burden, accelerates materials screening, and supports intelligent optimization of hydrogen-based fuel cell technologies, contributing to the advancement of scalable clean energy infrastructure
Downloads
References
Chi, V. M., Hai, N. M., Lan, N., & Van Huong, N. (2023). An empirical model for electrical resistivity of mortar considering the synergistic effects of carbon fillers, current intensity, and environmental factors. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 19, e02685.
Harada, M. (1995). Minamata disease: Methylmercury poisoning in Japan caused by environmental pollution. Critical Reviews in Toxicology, 25(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3109
/10408449509089885
Hilson, G., & van der Vorst, R. (2002). Technology, managerial, and policy initiatives for improving environmental performance in small-scale gold mining industry. Environmental Management, 30(6), 764–777. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-002-2745-0
Kambey, J. L., Morita, M., & Tanaka, M. (2001). Present mercury problems in Indonesia: Impacts and future research needs. Science of the Total Environment, 269(1–3), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(00)00813-8
Li, P., Wu, T., Wang, Y., & Chen, Y. (2022). Environmental behavior and mobility of mercury in soil–water systems: Influencing factors and mechanism. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 424, 127593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127593
Minamata Convention on Mercury. (2025). Technical document: Mercury monitoring at and around ASGM sites. Secretariat of the Minamata Convention. minamataconvention.org
Nooraiepour, M., Masoudi, M., Song, Z., & Hellevang, H. (2025). Adaptive Physics-Informed Neural Networks with Multi-Category Feature Engineering for Hydrogen Sorption Prediction in Clays, Shales, and Coals. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.00049.
Osman, A. I., Nasr, M., Farghali, M., Rashwan, A. K., Abdelkader, A., Al-Muhtaseb, A. A. H., ... & Rooney, D. W. (2024). Optimizing biodiesel production from waste with computational chemistry, machine learning and policy insights: a review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 22(3), 1005-1071.
Osman, M. K., Mohamad, E., Kamarudin, N., & Rahman, A. A. (2024). Warehouse operations optimisation through the implementation of lean methodology: A comprehensive review. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 8(4).
Pirrone, N., Cinnirella, S., Feng, X., Finkelman, R. B., Friedli, H. R., Leaner, J., Mason, R., Mukherjee, A. B., Stracher, G., Streets, D. G., & Telmer, K. (2013). Global mercury emissions to the atmosphere from anthropogenic and natural sources. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 13(1), 471–501. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-471-2013
Pourrahmani, H., Madi, H., & Van Herle, J. (2025). The Decentralized Hydrogen Revolution Using Artificial Intelligence, Internet of Things, and Blockchain. Elsevier.
Pourrahmani, H., Mohammadi, M. H., Pourhasani, B., Gharehghani, A., Moghimi, M., & Van Herle, J. (2023). Simulation and optimization of the impacts of metal-organic frameworks on the hydrogen adsorption using computational fluid dynamics and artificial neural networks. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 18032.
Selvaraj, V., S, S., & Karuppasamy, G. (2025). Layered double hydroxide nanocomposites: a promising platform for sustainable photocatalytic solutions—a short review. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 27(2), 39.
Skoog, D. A., Holler, F. J., & Crouch, S. R. (2014). Principles of instrumental analysis (6th ed.). Boston: Cengage Learning.
Soe, P. S., et al. (2022). Mercury pollution from artisanal and small-scale gold mining: A global review of environmental and human health impacts. International Journal / PMC article. Retrieved from PubMed Central. PMC
Telmer, K., & Veiga, M. M. (2009). World emissions of mercury from artisanal and small scale gold mining. In N. Pirrone & R. Mason (Eds.), Mercury fate and transport in the global atmosphere (pp. 131–172). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-93958-2_6
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (1994). Method 245.1: Determination of ercury in Water by Cold Vapor Atomic Absorption Spectrometry. Cincinnati, OH. Environmental Protection Agency
Wang, X., Breunig, H. M., & Peng, P. (2025). Broad range material-to-system screening of metal–organic frameworks for hydrogen storage using machine learning. Applied Energy, 383, 125346.
Wang, X., Zhang, L., & Feng, X. (2021). Complexation between mercury and dissolved organic matter: Implications for mercury transport and transformation. Chemosphere, 263, 128279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128279
Welz, B., & Sperling, M. (1999). Atomic absorption spectrometry (3rd ed.). Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.
Yu, R., Kim, E. H., & Hsu-Kim, H. (2023). Advances in understanding microbial mercury methylation and demethylation in aquatic environments. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 21(3), 185–198. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-022-00781-4
Zhang, T., Knightes, C. D., & Sunderland, E. M. (2020). Impact of pH and dissolved organic matter on mercury speciation and mobility in contaminated soils. Environmental Pollution, 260, 114034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114034
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Wahyu Sasongko Putro, Yandhika Surya Akbar Gumilang, Farid Baskoro

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


















