Needs Analysis of Cosmetology Education Student Assessment Instrument on the Development of the Rasch Model Module

Mia Hafizah Tumangger; Ryzka Cahyaningrum

doi:10.56806/jh.v6i2.202

Authors

Mia Hafizah Tumangger Engineering Faculty, Universitas Negeri Semarang
Ryzka Cahyaningrum Universitas Negeri Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56806/jh.v6i2.202

Keywords:

Assessment Instrument; Cosmetology Education; Rasch Model Module.

Abstract

Employing valid and reliable instruments aligned with the student population’s characteristics is essential. This study aimed to analyze the requirements of student assessment instruments in the Cosmetology Education study program to support the development of Rasch Model learning modules. The present study comprised 20 students enrolled in the cosmetology education program at Semarang University, who were selected based on purposive sampling. The research data were collected through observation, focus group discussions (FGDs), and documentation using observation sheets, FGD guides, and smartphones. The present study employed the stages of data analysis proposed by Miles and Huberman to analyze the research data obtained. The findings of the analysis demonstrated that the assessment instrument for cosmetology education students needs to be developed to support the Rasch Model module. It is anticipated that lecturers who wish to develop student assessment instruments will consider this research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amelia, A., Muslim, M., & Chandra, A. F. (2020). Karakteristik Instrumen Non-Tes Sustainability Awareness Menggunakan Analisis Rasch Model Materi Pemanasan Global Untuk Siswa Sekolah Menengah. WaPFi (Wahana Pendidikan Fisika), 5(2), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.17509/wapfi.v5i2.27431

Arikunto, S. (2018). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Bumi Aksara.

Artaraz, K. (2007). Review Essay: Re-Thinking the Teaching of Research and its Practice in Applied Settings. Sociology, 41(6), 1209–1214. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038507082321

Azizah, A., & Wahyuningsih, S. (2020). Penggunaan Model Rasch Untuk Analisis Instrumen Tes Pada Mata Kuliah Matematika Aktuaria. JUPITEK: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1), 45–50. https://doi.org/10.30598/jupitekvol3iss1pp45-50

Baird, J. A., Andrich, D., Hopfenbeck, T. N., & Stobart, G. (2017). Assessment and Learning: Fields Apart? Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 24(3), 317–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2017.1319337

Baranovskaya, T., & Shaforostova, V. (2017). Assessment and Evaluation Techniques. Journal of Language and Education, 3(2), 30–38. https://doi.org/10.17323/2411-7390-2017-3-2-30-38

Berry, R., & Adamsaon, B. (2011). Assessment Reform in Education: Policy and Practice. In Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice (Vol. 20, Issue 3). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0729-0

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom Assessment and Pedagogy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 25(6), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807

Bond, T. G., Yan, Z., & Heene, M. (2021). Applying the Rasch Model. In Applying the Rasch Model. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410614575

Boone, W. J. (2016). Rasch Analysis for Instrument Development: Why, When, and How? CBE Life Sciences Education, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-04-0148

Cahyaningrum, R., Lestari, W., & Supriyadi. (2022). Needs Analysis of Development of Critical Thinking Skills Assessment Instruments on Vocational School English Subjects. JELTL (Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics), 7(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v7i1.686

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications.

Ding, X. (2021). College education and internal migration in China. China Economic Review, 69(June). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2021.101649

Fleer, M. (2015). Developing an Assessment Pedagogy: the Tensions and Struggles in Re-Theorising Assessment from a Cultural–Historical Perspective. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 22(2), 224–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2015.1015403

Griffiths, R., Mislevy, J., & Wang, S. (2022). Encouraging impacts of an Open Education Resource Degree Initiative on college students’ progress to degree. Higher Education, 84(5), 1089–1106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00817-9

Handayani, F., & Lestari, W. (2019). Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation Need Analysis in The Development of HOTS-Oriented Study Project Assesment Instrument in Android-Based Science Learning. Jere, 8(1), 57–64. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jere

Hardani, Auliya, N. H., Andriani, H., Fardani, R. A., Ustiawaty, J., Utami, E. F., Sukmana, D. J., & Istiqomah, R. R. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. Pustaka Ilmu.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. SAGE Publications.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. SAGE Publications.

Ngadi, N. (2023). Analisis Model Rasch Untuk Mengukur Kompetensi Pengetahuan Siswa Smkn 1 Kalianget Pada Mata Pelajaran Perawatan Sistem Kelistrikan Sepeda Motor. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi Otomotif, 6(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpvo.v6i1.63479

Nurhasanah, A., Acesta, A., & Simbolon, M. E. (2023). Analisis Kebutuhan Pengembangan Assesmen Diagnostik Non Kognitif Jenjang Sekolah Dasar. Pedagogi: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 10(2), 46–54. https://doi.org/10.25134/pedagogi.v10i2.8851

Ojoboh, T. M., & Igben, H. G. O. (2024). Impact of Research Methodology on Data Quality and Research Findings. JPPUMA Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Dan Sosial Politik Universitas Medan Area, 12(1), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.31289/jppuma.v12i1.11793

Pratama, A. D., Bakti, B. S., Dewi, I. C., Gunasti, A., & Ferdi, S. (2024). Pemanfaatan rasch model untuk memetakan kemampuan kader Nasyiatul Aisyiah kabupaten Jember. Selaparang …, 8, 751–760. https://journal.ummat.ac.id/index.php/jpmb/article/view/22233%0Ahttps://journal.ummat.ac.id/index.php/jpmb/article/download/22233/8879

Retnawati, H. (2014). Teori Respons Butir dan Penerapannya “Untuk Peneliti, Praktisi Pengukuran dan Pengujian, Mahasiswa Pascasarjana.” Parama Publishing.

Shabina, S., Amit, T. K., Eram, P., & Pranav, K. (2024). Focus Group Discussion?: An Emerging Qualitative Tool for Educational Research. International Journal of Research and Review, 11(September), 302–308. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20240932 ABSTRACT

Shi, L., Gong, S., Huang, X., & Chen, J. (2024). Curriculum Reform Practices in “Cosmetic Product Formulation Design and Preparation Technology” Under the Perspective of Integration of Industry, Education, and Research. Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 8(6), 194–201. https://doi.org/10.26689/jcer.v8i6.7096

Shidiq, U., & Choiri, M. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif di Bidang Pendidikan. Nata Karya.

Siregar, H. M. (2022). Pengembangan Instrumen Angket Persepsi Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika Terhadap Pembelajaran Daring. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 971. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v11i2.4702

Sufriadi, D., & Zakaria, Z. (2022). Pemanfaatan Google Form untuk Penilaian Harian Mata Kuliah Mahasiswa Universitas Serambi Mekkah. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 2(2), 58–62. https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v2i2.5976

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Suharti, D. S., Sutikno, E. U., & Santi, H. D. A. (2020). Prewriting Activities Using Assisted-Technology in Efl Journalism: a Needs Analysis. PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education), 3(6), 795.

Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2013). Aplikasi Model Rasch Untuk Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial.

Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2015). Aplikasi Pemodelan Rasch pada Assessment Pendidikan (Penerbit T). Penerbit Trim Komikata.

Tumangger, M. H., Kartono, & Ridlo, S. (2022). Analisis Kebutuhan Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif pada Mata Pelajaran Matematika untuk Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(5), 9170–9179. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i5.3623

von Davier, M., Yamamoto, K., Shin, H. J., Chen, H., Khorramdel, L., Weeks, J., Davis, S., Kong, N., & Kandathil, M. (2019). Evaluating Item Response Theory Linking and Model Fit for Data from PISA 2000–2012. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 26(4), 466–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2019.1586642

Wang, J., Yang, Y., Liu, H., & Jiang, L. (2024). Enhancing the college and university physical education teaching and learning experience using virtual reality and particle swarm optimization. Soft Computing, 28(2), 1277–1294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-023-09528-4

Widowati, T., Widya, E., Setyowati, E., Windayani, N. R., Wahyuni, I. E., Krisna Putri, A., Sekar, F., & Dewani, H. (2024). Pengembangan Alat Evaluasi Quizizz Untuk Mengungkap Personal Branding Mahasiswa Tata Kecantikan Menuju Dunia Kerja. Didaktika:Jurnal Kependidikan, 13(3), 3821–3832.

Yasienta, A., & Nadhirotul, L. (2015). PERSEPSI SISWA TERHADAP METODE PENGAJARAN KEWIRAUSAHAAN DENGAN TINGKAT MINAT BERWIRAUSAHA SISWA SMA. Jurnal Ilmiah Peternakan Terpadu, 151(01), 10–17.

Zainuddin, M., Sutansi, S., & Untari, E. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Evaluasi Pembelajaran Tematik Berbasis HOTS (Higher order Thinking skill) dengan Penekanan Karakter. Briliant: Jurnal Riset Dan Konseptual, 5(4), 739. https://doi.org/10.28926/briliant.v5i4.565

Zhang, Q., Wang, K., & Zhou, S. (2020). Application and practice of vr virtual education platform in improving the quality and ability of college students. IEEE Access, 8, 162830–162837. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3019262