EVALUASI PERTUKARAN MAHASISWA MERDEKA BERBASIS MATA KULIAH MENGGUNAKAN PROVUS’S DISCREPANCY MODEL DENGAN DOUBLE SMART

Authors

  • M. Zainuddin IKIP PGRI Bojonegoro
  • A. D. Utami IKIP PGRI Bojonegoro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5806/jh.v2i4.34

Keywords:

Program Evaluation, Student Exchange, Freedom/Independent Campus Learning, Povus' Discrepancy Model, double smart.

Abstract

This study aims to describe the gaps among definitions, installations, processes, and products with standard operational criteria in the independent student exchange cooperation program. The study used Povus' discrepancy model. The subjects of this study involved lecturers and students from Universitas PGRI Madiun, IKIP PGRI Bojonegoro, Muhammadiyah University of Ponorogo, Muhammadiyah University of Kotabumi, STKIP PGRI Bangkalan, and STKIP Taman Siswa Bima. The data were collected through interviews, questionnaires, observation, and document analysis. Then, they were analyzed using descriptive qualitative, which was then compared with standard criteria. The results show that the student exchange program focused on course exchange at IKIP PGRI Bojonegoro, Universitas PGRI Madiun, Muhammadiyah University of Ponorogo, STKIP PGRI Bangkalan, and STKIP Taman Siswa Bima, i.e., design, installation, process, and products is following the guidelines for implementing the independent student exchange cooperation program. It was found that there was a gap in the program implementation process, but the program objectives had been achieved. Students who participated in the program were facilitated in developing science and technology, Wawasan Kebangsaan (national vision), nationalism, and the understanding of diversity, plurality, and tolerance from other universities. It was revealed that 85% of the students got an A predicate, and the rest got B in courses taken at other universities. Based on the implementation of double-smart, it is hoped that the independent student exchange cooperation program, which is focused on course exchange, can be continued with improvements.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arikunto, S., & Jabar, C. S. A. (2009). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan: Pedoman Teoretis Praktis bagi Mahasiswa dan Praktisi Pendidikan. Bumi Aksara.

Asfar, A. M. I. T., & Asfar, A. M. I. A. (2020). Zoom aman bagi pengguna?? Review kelemahan dan panduan praktis preventif pembelajaran melalui daring atau online . Sistem pembelajaran dan bekerja online dari rumah sebagai bentuk Study From Home atau Work From Home memungkinkan menjadi solusi untuk memut. May. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.34634.93121

Association for Prevention of Torture (APT). (2011). Making Effective Recommendation. Center for Detention Studies.

Faiz, A., & Purwati. (2021). Koherensi Program Pertukaran Pelajar Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka dan General Education. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(3), 649–655.

Insani, N. N., Fitriasari, S., & Iswandi, D. (2021). Persepsi Mahasiswa Tentang Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka. MUKADIMAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sejarah, Dan Ilmu, 3(2), 6.

Lian, B. (2019). Tanggung Jawab Tridharma Perguruan Tinggi Menjawab Kebutuhan Masyarakat. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Program Pascasarjana Universitas PGRI Palembang, 2, 999–1015.

Makhmud, A. I., Sukestiyarno, Setiawan, I., Muslim, A., Koesmaryono, Y., Faiqoh, Jesica, A. M., Marbun, K., Widodo, S., Tanjung, E. F., & Kusuma, M. R. (2021). Panduan Operasional Baku (POB) Pertukaran Mahasiswa Merdeka. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia.

https://kampusmerdeka.kemdikbud.go.id/web/assets/pertukaranMahasiswaMerdeka/assets/POB-Pertukaran-Mahasiswa-Merdeka.pdf

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. (2007). Analisis Data Kualitatif Buku Sumber tentang Metode-Metode Baru. Terjemahan Tjetjep Rohendi Rohisi. Universitas Indonesia.

Mustafa, P. S. (2021). Model Discrepancy sebagai Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Palapa, 9(1), 182–198. https://doi.org/10.36088/palapa.v9i1.1067

Rifazka, A., Darmantoro, D., Setiawan, E. B., & Si, S. (2009). Penilaian Performansi Kerja Account Manager Dengan Menggunakan Metode MBO (Management By Objective) dan RICH (Rank Inclusion In Criteria Hierarchies). Seminar Nasional Aplikasi Teknologi Informasi 2009 (SNATI 2009), 2009(SNATI), 101–107.

Sudjana, D. (2006). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Luar Sekolah. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Tohir, M. (2020). Buku Panduan Merdeka Belajar - Kampus Merdeka. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi Kemdikbud RI. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/ujmte

Utomo, G., Riyono, B., & Budiharto, S. (2017). Efektivitas Program Management By Objectives Pada Tingkat Work Engagement Karyawan Pt. X Ice Cream Yogyakarta. Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi Terapan, 5(2), 210. https://doi.org/10.22219/jipt.v5i2.4562

Downloads

Published

2021-12-31

How to Cite

Zainudin, M. ., & Utami, A. D. (2021). EVALUASI PERTUKARAN MAHASISWA MERDEKA BERBASIS MATA KULIAH MENGGUNAKAN PROVUS’S DISCREPANCY MODEL DENGAN DOUBLE SMART. JURNAL HURRIAH: Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan Dan Penelitian, 2(4), 10-21. https://doi.org/10.5806/jh.v2i4.34